Hesti vs CenuBanka — which data tool wins?
Key takeaways
Deeper, near-real-time analytics — Hesti ingests fresh market deals and ML models, while CenuBanka relies mainly on historical Land Registry data.
More professional tools — Hesti ships an API, price forecasts and zoning filters; CenuBanka focuses on a basic data table and search.
Friendlier UI — Hesti offers a responsive dashboard and customizable reports, whereas CenuBanka retains a simpler, old-school look.
Overview
Both Hesti and Cenu Banka bring Latvian real-estate prices under one roof. The key difference is data freshness and analytics depth—Hesti refreshes deals daily and uses machine-learning forecasts, while CenuBanka provides a stable, no-frills view of historical Land Service transactions.
Data coverage & sources
Hesti merges listings, Land Registry sales, developer pipelines and public lease data for broad coverage. CenuBanka mainly tracks Land Registry deals; you won’t find rental prices or off-plan projects there.
Features & usability
Hesti delivers price predictions, zoning maps, and an investor comparison panel. CenuBanka offers a table export (Excel) and simple filters by address, size and date.
Conclusion
Need a quick snapshot of historic deals for a low fee? CenuBanka is enough. Working on investment models, require real-time forecasts or wide data exports? Hesti is likely the better fit.
Mārtiņš Kozlovskis